The Trump administration has stacked a prime chemical security board with industry-aligned scientists who’ve a variety of monetary conflicts of curiosity and stand to revenue from deregulation, public well being advocates say.

The Environmental Safety Company’s science advisory committee on chemical compounds (SACC) is slated to evaluate analysis for dozens of poisonous chemical compounds throughout the brand new members’ phrases. At the very least 13 proposed Trump appointees are in all probability conflicted on the chemical compounds that will likely be reviewed, feedback filed with the EPA by a coalition of public well being advocacy teams alleges.

Their appointment, critics warn, is designed to supply scientific justification for the EPA’s broader marketing campaign to dismantle the nation’s protections towards poisonous chemical compounds.

Among the many appointees are Wade Barranco, employed by Lyondell Chemical Firm, which in 2024 launched practically 1m kilos of chemical compounds more likely to be reviewed by the SACC throughout his time period, together with acetaldehyde, benzene, ethylbenzene, naphthalene and styrene.

The general public well being teams say the appointees’ participation on evaluations in which there’s a battle may very well be unlawful. They pointed to federal regulation and the EPA’s inside pointers that state that the SACC should be “each balanced and freed from members who’ve precise or perceived conflicts of curiosity or an look of a lack of impartiality”.