Cup scores are thought of by some an goal measure of espresso high quality, however they’ve been met with growing criticism lately. Scoring dictates the costs producers obtain, reaffirming the extensively held perception that the worth of espresso is greater than only a numerical ranking.

Regardless of all efforts to cup pretty and constantly, the reliance on human-led sensory evaluation means decision-making is at all times subjective to a level. Two Q graders might award completely different scores for a similar espresso, for instance. 

Cup scores may also differ between actors throughout the provision chain, most noticeably between majority-consuming and majority-producing nations, highlighting broader problems with a scarcity of transparency and inherent bias.

I spoke with Marianella Baez Jost of Farmers Mission Specialty Espresso and Krzysztof Blinkiewicz of Pink Ink Espresso to find out how we will handle these discrepancies in cup scores.

You may additionally like our article on whether or not cup scores imply something to shoppers.

Assessing espresso high quality is inherently subjective

Cupping and scoring espresso are important trade practices. With out protocols and instruments just like the SCA cupping type, there could be no standardised measures of espresso high quality.

Nevertheless, the concept cup scores are essentially the most goal solution to assess espresso high quality and, due to this fact, decide its worth is inherently flawed. Particular person bias is inextricably linked to human-led sensory evaluation, that means private opinion will at all times be at play.

The espresso trade is world, and style preferences differ worldwide. Whereas some might take into account a flavour word “overly fermented”, others might understand it as extremely fascinating, for instance. This exacerbates the shortage of common calibration and hinders a shared understanding of espresso flavour and high quality.

Given that offer chain actors within the World North are largely in command of sensory evaluation and scoring, these methods usually favour them, failing to know the flavour experiences of individuals within the World South. To deal with this straight, trade professionals in nations corresponding to Taiwan and Indonesia have developed localised Taste Wheels that promote extra numerous and inclusive conversations about espresso high quality evaluation.

Regardless of this progress, the sensory evaluation protocols designed by actors in majority-consuming nations stay the universally accepted strategies to guage espresso high quality. This has a significant influence on pricing mechanisms, that means actors within the World North have extra management over the costs producers obtain for his or her espresso.

Addressing discrepancies throughout the provision chain

Private bias can imply that two Q graders might award the identical espresso two completely different scores. Whereas that is a lot much less more likely to occur in a high quality management lab the place Q graders frequently calibrate, as an illustration, it’s not an unusual prevalence throughout varied ranges of the provision chain.

In some instances, noticeable discrepancies might exist between the scores offered by producers, exporters, importers, and roasters. This could happen for a number of causes, and it’s problematic in numerous methods. 

For example, a producer might cup their espresso and award it 87 factors, sharing this quantity with the exporter or importer, which in flip dictates the differential paid above the market worth. Nevertheless, the importer or roaster might rating it 85 factors, leaving farmers weak to cost negotiations.

In one other case, a roaster might rating a espresso greater than the producer. In the event that they show this ranking on their packaging, they will cost a premium that they could not at all times go on to producers.

We consult with this as “pointwashing,” or, in instances the place roasters really feel pressured to outperform their rivals and rating their coffees greater, “cup rating inflation.”

“Pointwashing is the inflation or misrepresentation of espresso scores, whether or not intentional or unintentional, to provide a espresso extra worth than it really has,” says Krzysztof Blinkiewicz, the founding father of espresso schooling platform Pink Ink Espresso, Authorised SCA Coach, and Q grader.

“It happens when the rating printed on a bag or utilized in advertising and marketing not (or by no means did) replicate the true sensory expertise, particularly from the buyer’s perspective,” he provides. “It is a systemic challenge, not only a one-time exaggeration. It usually stems from a scarcity of calibration, a scarcity of transparency within the provide chain, or stress to fulfill market expectations.”

Understanding the explanations behind “pointwashing”

Because the espresso trade depends closely on cup scores and high quality evaluation to set costs, there’s a clear want to know why discrepancies exist, particularly between majority-producing and majority-consuming nations.

A key issue to notice is that espresso high quality adjustments because it progresses by means of the provision chain. From harvesting to drying, milling, and export, every stage of the worth chain impacts flavour and high quality. The espresso {that a} high quality management lab supervisor cups in Kenya received’t style precisely the identical as what the importer in Germany receives, as an illustration.

Many of those adjustments are unavoidable. With geographical distance and time frames in thoughts, it’s inevitable that cup scores will differ. Nevertheless, the primary downside lies in the truth that consumers are largely in command of scoring methods, which suggests they’re extra simply in a position to affect costs, doubtlessly placing producers at an obstacle.

“Pointwashing usually occurs passively. Individuals within the provide chain, primarily roasters and baristas, use cup scores with out enthusiastic about the place they got here from or how they had been calibrated,” Krzysztof says. “Nonetheless, there are clear instances the place importers or roasters inflate scores to justify a better worth or to face out in a aggressive market. 

“When rankings grow to be a software of persuasion slightly than for assessing high quality, the integrity of the complete worth chain begins to deteriorate. It additionally impacts the general high quality of espresso available on the market,” he provides. “Producers might really feel compelled to ‘enhance’ coffees with descriptions that don’t match the precise style, in addition to with processing strategies, together with experimental strategies, to ‘justify’ faulty flavours with inflated scores.

“Roasters might lose the flexibility (and even the will) to independently consider flavour, relying as a substitute on inherited rankings, or their inner high quality management turns into completely affected by the error of suggestion.”

Though they carry little that means for many shoppers, cup scores have an effect on the finish of the provision chain when used for advertising and marketing functions.

“Shoppers are misled. They could drink one thing disagreeable however reward it anyway due to the label ranking and the (usually considerably) greater worth that comes with it,” says Krzysztof.

What are the options?

Cup scores usually divide opinion in specialty espresso. Whereas some assert they’re essentially the most goal solution to outline high quality, others consider they’re too slim and don’t consider a espresso’s holistic worth.

New high quality evaluation protocols declare to handle this challenge, however many within the trade query their motives and the effectiveness of their implementation. Furthermore, they’re unlikely to handle subjectivity and discrepancies in cup scores, particularly between majority-consuming and majority-producing nations.

“No matter whether or not pointwashing is completed with good or unhealthy intentions, the end result is identical: distortion of worth, breakdown of belief, and confusion in regards to the true that means of high quality,” Krzysztof says.

For some, the reply is to withhold private cup scores from consumers, avoiding any potential affect or persuasion of their decision-making.

“My opinion on cup rating discrepancies is easy, and I’ve utilized it to my enterprise from the beginning: For Farmers Mission Specialty Espresso, the main target is on the standard of the entire course of, from seedling to soil inputs to choosing to moist and dry milling,” says Marianella Baez Jost, a producer at Café con Amor in Costa Rica. “We conduct our inner high quality management utilizing Q graders in Costa Rica and the US, however we by no means disclose scores to clients. We give them the samples and allow them to be the ultimate decide.”

As espresso shopper calls for shift and so they grow to be more and more price-conscious, many favour extremely customised drinks that provide extra perceived worth for cash. Roasters, in the meantime, are grappling with tight margins, making cost-effective coffees extra viable. Each reshape shopping for behaviour and have an effect on the kind of coffees that roasters are sourcing, that means cup scores might lose their significance.

“Our trade is at the moment promoting extra sugar than espresso. Chilly espresso is rising quick, and drink menus are evolving quicker,” Marianella says. “Roasters supply espresso pondering of what their common buyer likes – what coffees generally is a stable addition, an excellent, enjoyable, or distinctive launch? 

“They’re finally not shopping for based mostly on cup rating alone, however extra on flavour high quality, and banking on consistency, style character, and a clear cup.”

The necessity for extra transparency

Conversely, a push for much more transparency, usually thought of a cornerstone of specialty espresso, might assist resolve notable variations in cup scores.

“Each participant within the provide chain needs to be inspired (or ideally required, though this isn’t life like within the present world context) to doc how the rating was decided,” Krzysztof says. “Who tasted the espresso, when, the place, and beneath what circumstances? Which cupping type was used? Was calibration carried out? What had been the outcomes of any comparisons between the fatherland and the buyer market?”

The difficulty, nonetheless, lies in making certain that espresso professionals at origin have equal entry to comparable high quality management and evaluation sources as these in majority-consuming markets. Many smallholders are unable to formally cup and style their very own coffees, which hinders their means to affect the costs they obtain.

“If we need to talk analysis outcomes, we should be fully trustworthy about their origin and context,” Krzysztof says. “Ideally, every rating could be accompanied by metadata, possibly even linked by means of a code to a dependable supply. Some even counsel utilizing blockchain.”

AI-driven know-how affords an answer to scale back the standard differentiation between consumers and sellers, however making certain equal entry throughout geographies nonetheless presents a barrier.

Finally, the answer might lie in higher transparency about how cup scores change over time.

“If we supplied one rating per degree of the provision chain, for instance, one from the producer’s QC lab, one from the importer, and one from the roaster, it might assist shoppers perceive how the espresso evolves,” Krzysztof says. “However what number of shoppers would really know what that every one means? Individuals need readability, not complexity.”

Human-led sensory evaluation is at the moment the universally accepted technique for outlining espresso high quality, and due to this fact, its worth. Inevitably, this implies bias will at all times be an affect, resulting in variations in cup scores between people and firms throughout the provision chain.

Whereas know-how affords options to this challenge, they aren’t but extensively obtainable. For now, the significance lies in understanding how espresso high quality adjustments over time, in addition to how producers and professionals at origin should be extra concerned within the high quality management and pricing course of, slightly than merely being “worth takers”.

Loved this? Then learn our article on what cupping can inform producers about their espresso.

Good Each day Grind

Wish to learn extra articles like this? Join our e-newsletter!