Two yogurt giants are actually locked right into a authorized battle over chilly brew branding, as Danone is alleging trademark infringement in opposition to La Colombe dad or mum firm Chobani.

On the heart of the lawsuit is using the phrase “Shiny & Mellow” on packages of ready-to-drink chilly brew.

In accordance with U.S. court docket data, Danone or its subsidiaries have filed authorized motion in opposition to Chobani not less than 4 instances since 2012, together with a number of allegations of false promoting, with combined outcomes.

The newest go well with, filed Tuesday within the U.S. District Court docket for the Southern District of New York, alleges that Chobani infringed on Danone’s mental property in a “understanding, calculated, and systematic” method following its $900 million acquisition of the La Colombe espresso firm in 2023.

The go well with was filed on behalf of Danone US, the U.S. enterprise of French multinational packaged meals big Danone, which owns the Dannon and Oikos yogurt manufacturers, amongst many others.

Danone additionally owns the Stok (at the moment styled SToK by the corporate) ready-to-drink chilly brew model, whose merchandise compete with La Colombe’s at main grocery chains comparable to Goal, Kroger and Wal-Mart.

U.S.-based Chobani, which expanded into drinks after constructing a yogurt empire in New York, has not but filed a proper reply to the go well with. The corporate didn’t instantly reply to DCN’s request for remark.

The lawsuit alleges that after the acquisition, Chobani altered an present chilly brew product to imitate an present Stok chilly brew product by utilizing an identical golden yellow shade and the descriptors “mild roast” and “Shiny & Mellow.” Danone contends that the product packaging infringes upon its emblems associated to an present Stok unsweetened chilly brew product with a yellow label and the outstanding descriptor “Shiny & Mellow.”

Within the go well with, Danone US outlined its course of in arriving on the “Shiny & Mellow” title in 2020, because it sought to distinguish the lighter-roasted brew from competing merchandise. In accordance with the criticism, the corporate discovered that some focus teams weren’t drawn in by the phrase.

“As an example, one respondent acknowledged, ‘I don’t actually know what to anticipate it to style like from the title,’ and one other respondent replied, ‘I can think about mellow however not shiny so I would attempt however in all probability not,’” the go well with states.

Regardless of this suggestions, Danone moved ahead with the “Shiny & Mellow” label.

“Danone decided that ‘Shiny & Mellow’ cued in customers fascinating associations and urged an attractive and optimistic style expertise, whereas additionally performing as a novel differentiator amongst competing merchandise,” the criticism states. “Actually, the individuality of the title was recognized as a possible disadvantage for ‘Shiny & Mellow’ throughout Danone’s shopper analysis, with some focus group respondents explicitly reporting that the title didn’t convey any helpful details about the product or its style.”

The case is Danone US, LLC and WhiteWave Providers, Inc. v. Chobani, LLC, No. 1:25-cv-6217.

Feedback? Questions? Information to share? Contact DCN’s editors right here. For all the most recent espresso business information, subscribe to the DCN publication.

Associated Posts