It’s been a whirlwind of exercise in Casa Molinaro the previous week. Sure, we’re again residence, largely again within the groove, and this morning, we even had a little bit of rain. I’ve by no means in my complete life been so relieved to see the tiny, shallow puddles gathering on our terrace. I need to thank all of you who reached out to me final week to examine in on our security. For some cause, although, all of them went to my spambox (bizarre!) and I didn’t see them till yesterday, so please excuse my delay in replying (I’ll!).

Throughout the evacuation, whereas staying at our associates’ residence, I really needed to prepare for interviews with BBC Information and CBC Information. They’d seen a clip of my chat with CNN on the forthcoming TikTok ban and so they wished to have me weigh in as each a content material creator and a lawyer. I used to be sporting a grungy white tank prime and sweatpants after I confirmed up at our short-term retreat and hadn’t brushed my hair in two days. I definitely hadn’t thought to incorporate a swimsuit jacket and make-up after I packed my “go-bag.” My pal graciously lent me a navy blazer to put on over my tank prime and I purchased some make-up from CVS, make-up I utilized whereas sitting on the carpeted flooring of our associates’ eldest teenage son’s bed room.

Regardless of having to offer one of many interviews on that flooring with my laptop computer propped up on the mattress, microphone clutched in my palms, it went fairly effectively. It felt good to place my lawyer hat on to offer my learn on the state of affairs. At the moment, the Supreme Courtroom hadn’t but weighed in with a choice, however, after listening to snippets of the oral arguments, it appeared unlikely TikTok would discover any judicial reprieve.

I can guess that lots of you’re rolling your eyes. Who cares a few bunch of influencers with their unusual and doubtless inappropriate gyrations on an app that’s gift-wrapping all our information for the PRC? Let’s set to at least one aspect whether or not or not TikTok deserves your curiosity (TikTok is considered liable for $24 billion added to the US GDP, 224,000 jobs in simply 2023 alone, in addition to host to 7 million small companies, however, I digress…). We will additionally shelve for one more day (or by no means) how a lot I sobbed whereas sitting on my sofa on Saturday night, studying by all of the feedback younger individuals left on my last video (which apparently wasn’t very last in any respect–most of us at the moment are again on the app) about how a lot I’d helped them over time.

What I discover attention-grabbing, fascinating, and in addition a bit of alarming is the overt lawlessness of all of it. As all of us realized in social research class, our authorities is split into three branches: legislative, judicial, and govt. The TikTok Ban was signed into regulation by a bipartisan Congress (legislative). The regulation gave the President (govt) till January 19, 2025 (i.e., the Biden Administration) to certify to Congress {that a} sale of TikTok to a US-owned firm was within the works and subsequently, an extension was warranted. No such certification was made (nor might it have been, until our President determined to, like, lie). The US Supreme Courtroom (judicial) issued a unanimous opinion thwarting any constitutional challenges to the TikTok Ban. All three branches of presidency have weighed in and all three have cemented the Ban as The Regulation of the Land.

And but, right here I’m. On January 19, having simply posted a TikTok video, after which I “hearted” a refrain of feedback singing, “We’re BAAAAAACCCCCKKKKK.”

How did we get right here?

I’m not an insider with entry to the political maneuverings that happen on the Hill, however I can say, legally, this doesn’t work. I’ve learn the statute, backwards and forwards, a number of instances. Nobody might legally save TikTok as soon as SCOTUS issued its choice, until after all, he lied.

And I assume that’s a adequate segue into what I’m attempting to explain–a public breakdown in integrity.

I usually see the phrase “flouting the plain language of the regulation” in authorized briefs (which often prompts an instantaneous eye-roll), however can there be a extra good phrase to explain what’s presently occurring? By the point you’re studying this e mail, the brand new U.S. President can have signed an govt order purporting to “delay” the ban for a set time period and pundits and influencers alike are questioning whether or not it was all only a large PR stunt.

Say what you need about whether or not the regulation is an effective one, a good one, or a constitutional one (I’ve numerous ideas on this), however it’s nonetheless a regulation that’s been by all the checks and balances of our system of presidency. And but, two Presidents–Joe Biden and Donald Trump–have publicly declared that they don’t have any intention of imposing The Regulation of the Land. Not solely is that this an entire slap within the face to the opposite two branches of presidency (I imply, if I’m one of many justices, I’ve gotta be like, “Okay so why did I simply RUIN my New 12 months’s vacation for all this CRAP!?”), it alerts to all of us that legal guidelines should not really, effectively, legal guidelines. At the very least not in the way in which we in all probability consider them.

Both there’s a elementary infirmity in the way in which these legal guidelines come to be or there’s an alarming loophole that may pull the rug out from what has already been demonstrated to be a fragile democracy. Or each.

Can our Republic afford to fall flat on its face?

Including to the “one thing about this feels a bit of off” vibes was the outgoing message that tons of of tens of millions of customers (myself included) acquired when attempting to log onto TikTok after the ban slid into impact:

“We’re lucky that President Trump has indicated that he’ll work with us on an answer to reinstate TikTok as soon as he takes workplace. Please keep tuned!”

Whut.

Did I simply hallucinate?

Did TikTok simply publicly put the manager department of the U.S. authorities on the hook to save lots of its a$$, which might basically require an end-run on the regulation as the primary order of enterprise within the Oval Workplace?

Earlier this morning (Sunday, on the time I used to be scripting this e mail), the message was changed with a way more generic one, saying that TikTok was “quickly unavailable,” and, like I mentioned, entry to TikTok has already been restored to many U.S. customers. When that entry was restored, the message was up to date as soon as extra to learn: “On account of President Trump’s efforts, TikTok is again within the U.S.!”

Clearly, these messages have many customers (like me) questioning what, precisely, has been saved…?

My guess is that between each presidential administrations’ dedication to ignoring the regulation, a considerable debit from Trump’s political capital vis-a-vis China (“did I point out I need to tariff you to the hills?”), and a Congress scrambling to mildew itself across the incoming administration (we’ve already seen many Republicans back-pedaling on the ban–Senator Jim Jordan loosely alluded to working with Trump on a possible repeal or modification of the regulation), the Regulation of the Land has about as a lot weight because the sheet of paper it was printed on.

Maybe much less.

Why does this matter?

Effectively, swirling round have been rumors that TikTok had been secretly offered to Meta (the U.S.-based father or mother firm to Fb and Instagram). Conspiracy netizens pointed to the truth that Fb was abruptly advising customers that they might hyperlink their TikTok profile to their Fb accounts (this function has really been round for some time). Instagram fully modified the looks of their hallmark grid, changing the acquainted sq. (which had been round for DECADES) with the rectangle (the scale of a brief type vertical video). As somebody who spent the second half of her profession defending class motion antitrust lawsuits and DOJ proceedings geared toward stopping my shoppers’ acquisitions, I famous that such a sale was extremely unlikely. The replies I acquired have been… enlightening:

“Effectively legal guidelines haven’t stopped any of them to date. I don’t know why they might now.”

“We aren’t a nation of legal guidelines anymore, clearly.”

“That means our authorities is a practice that’s nonetheless on the tracks. Every part looks like chaos is about to interrupt unfastened.”

And:

“Do legal guidelines matter anymore?”

Whereas I believe we’re nonetheless a methods off from an entire repeal of the Sherman Act, I’m greater than a bit of bit fearful about what all this spells for our nation, for our individuals’s religion in our authorities and the integrity of the custodians of energy. Whereas the erosion we’ve witnessed over the previous decade may make this a “no shock” to many, that doesn’t robotically by some means render it “no biggie.”

Up to now month, I’ve watched the information popping out of my mother and father’ homeland, South Korea, the traditionally silly transfer by President Yoon: instituting martial regulation as a final ditch effort to corral the opposition celebration, resulting in his arrest and unprecedented political upheaval. In case you didn’t know already, South Korea’s republic skilled an enormous and agonizing progress spurt within the Eighties, when a navy coup resulted within the dying of 144 civilians. Many individuals in South Korea can nonetheless bear in mind watching youngsters killed by troopers imposing martial regulation and would gladly storm the streets to make sure nothing like that ever occurs once more. I remind myself, time and again, In comparison with the U.S., South Korea’s republic may be very younger. It’s nonetheless in its toddler stage, nonetheless studying to stroll on its two legs with out falling over.

However watching the throngs of Korean protesters, atypical women and men who have been, as soon as extra, prepared to sacrifice their security and autonomy to make sure the sanctity of their democracy, the sturdy bulwark in opposition to lawlessness… effectively.

It made me ponder whether the U.S. nonetheless has so much to find out about what it means to construct a republic value saving.

Did you want this text? If that’s the case, please share it!

Parting Ideas

I do know I mentioned earlier that I’d shelve for “by no means” how I began crying Saturday night time when the ban went into impact, however only a couple phrases on why.

This article is among the few locations I really feel I can actually be weak. In all probability since you don’t should see my face whereas doing it! But additionally as a result of I do know you really take the time to analyze the human in me (and doubtless others). The human in me has been struggling the previous a number of days, maybe triggered by the displacement (literal and figurative) introduced on by the wildfires. I’ve been questioning whether or not I can “make it work” as a author. As my editor and I shuttle and backwards and forwards over the fitting cowl for guide 2, the concern that it gained’t do effectively is typically so overwhelming, it fairly actually takes my breath away. And with finicky algorithms or outright bans on platforms that assist me make a residing whereas I attempt to make it as an creator (solely)… The wildfires’ risk to my residence and physique revealed a sensitivity to the lurking existential risk I can’t appear to shake–the one I inherited from my mother and father.

My mother and pop have each confronted indescribable horror of their lives. They’ve achieved an unbelievable job of overcoming the trauma of their childhoods, however, inevitably, a few of that landed with me. They raised me to be frightened of taking monetary dangers. They taught me to consider in establishments earlier than I believed in me. They conditioned me to really feel scared, on a regular basis, that I might lose all the things–in a hearth, a recession, or a foul day on Instagram. All of this was protecting me up at night time–whether or not it was in my very own mattress or one which belonged to my associates. The phrase You’ll fail stored repeating itself in my head within the days main as much as the TikTok ban and the one factor offering me respite was bingeing a Okay-drama (no, not Squid Sport).

So, after I began studying the feedback to my last video on TikTok, so many individuals thanking me for serving to them get by a tricky day, a tricky month, a tricky yr, a tricky all the things… It was just like the universe was telling me, “Even when all else fails, bear in mind the nice stuff you’ve achieved. Bear in mind the individuals you’ve moved.”

I’m not as invincible as I could come off on individuals’s telephones. I cry so much. I get mad rapidly. I forgive method too simply. I deploy a sturdy vocabulary and a intelligent flip of phrase to arm me in opposition to those that would reap the benefits of my tenderness, and, maybe, to disguise the truth that I don’t at all times actually like myself all that a lot–a high quality that may make me incomprehensible to my associates, a burden to those that love me, and “cringe” to those that observe me (i.e., all of you). Going viral is an entirely extraordinary expertise, one that may trigger an indescribable mixture of feelings–exhilaration, concern, nervousness, pleasure. However being flooded with so many messages of solidarity and kindness whereas understanding it could be gone eternally…

That’s the reason I cried on the couch final night time.

Thanks, as at all times, for studying this far and letting me be me. <3

Wishing you all the perfect,
-Joanne

Questions and Feedback